the full guide

Where AI goes wrong

AI systems fail in predictable ways: bias from unfair data, hallucination in generative models, brittleness on inputs unlike their training data, and over-trust by the people using them. These are limits of how the systems work, and they don't go away just because a model seems confident.

8 min Intermediate

What you need: The earlier topics of this module.

Definition

AI systems fail in predictable ways: bias from unfair data, hallucination in generative models, brittleness on inputs unlike their training data, and over-trust by the people using them. These are limits of how the systems work, and they don't go away just because a model seems confident.

In simple words

A student who only studied last year's question paper can score well on it, and fail on a new one. AI is similar: it's good at what looks like its training data. It's also often unable to say "I don't know", so it may give a wrong answer in the same confident tone.

Why it matters

These failures have real costs. A resume filter can reject qualified people, a medical model can miss patients, and a lawyer can cite a case that doesn't exist. Knowing the failure types is the first step to using AI safely.

How it works

FailureWhat happensReal exampleWhat helps
BiasUnfair patterns in the data are learnedGender Shades (2018): commercial face analysis erred up to 34.7% for darker-skinned women, and up to 0.8% for lighter-skinned menBetter data, testing per group
HallucinationConfident, made-up factsFake court cases cited in legal filingsChecking sources, RAG
BrittlenessBreaks on unfamiliar inputSmall changes to an image can fool a vision modelTesting on varied data, monitoring
Data driftThe world changes after trainingDemand models after COVID-19 beganMonitoring, retraining
Over-trustPeople stop checkingAccepting wrong suggestions without reviewA human review step

Common mistakes

  • Taking AI output as fact when it matters. Check it, as you would check an unknown website.
  • Assuming a model is fair because no one programmed bias into it. Bias usually arrives through the data.
  • Testing only on data similar to the training set.

Check yourself

Question 1

1. An LLM invents a book that doesn't exist. This is called:

Question 2

2. A model's overall accuracy is 95%. Is it fair?

Summary

  • Main failures: bias, hallucination, brittleness, drift, over-trust.
  • Confidence doesn't mean correctness.
  • Test per group, monitor after launch, and keep a person in the loop for important decisions.

Finished reading?

Sources: Buolamwini & Gebru, Gender Shades (2018)